Measuring Perceived Ease of Artificial Intelligence Utilisation: An Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of a Scale among Preservice Mathematics Teachers in Nigerian Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64348/zije.2026599Keywords:
perceived ease of use; artificial intelligence; Technology Acceptance Model; scale adaptation; psychometric validation; preservice mathematics teachersAbstract
Perceived ease of use is a foundational construct in technology-acceptance research, yet instruments developed to measure it in relation to artificial intelligence (AI) remain scarce within African teacher-education contexts. Existing scales are rarely re-examined for the specific referent of AI-assisted mathematics learning. This study adapted a six-item Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) from the literature to an AI-in-mathematics-learning context and examined its psychometric properties among drawn 221 preservice mathematics teachers using a multistage non-probability sampling procedure from three higher institutions in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja, Nigeria. Confirmatory factor analysis of the initial six-item one-factor model showed inadequate fit (CFI = .886, TLI = .811). However, the removal of two items with low standardised loadings produced a four-item model with an excellent fit (χ²(2) = 2.770, p = .250, CFI = .991, TLI = .972, RMSEA = .042, SRMR = .026). The retained scale demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (ω = .723). Non-parametric comparisons revealed no statistically significant difference in PEOU AI across institutional type (Kruskal–Wallis χ²(2) = 3.637, p = .162) or gender (Mann–Whitney U, z = -.567, p = .571). The findings support a psychometrically sound, unidimensional four-item PEOU-AI scale for use in Nigerian mathematics teacher education and suggest that ease-of-use perceptions of AI tools are broadly comparable across the sampled institutions and gender groups.
References
Ahmed, S. K. (2024). How to choose a sampling technique and determine sample size for research: A simplified guide for researchers. Oral Oncology Reports, 12, Article 100662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oor.2024.100662 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oor.2024.100662
Awofala, A. O. A., Bazza, M. B., Ojo, O. T., Oladipo, A. J., Olabiyi, O. S., & Arigbabu, A. A. (2025). Structural equation modeling of Nigerian science, technology and mathematics teachers’ adoption of educational artificial intelligence tools. Digital Education Review, 46, 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2025.46.51-64 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2025.46.51-64
Ayanwale, M. A., Adelana, O. P., Molefi, R. R., Adeeko, O., & Ishola, A. M. (2024). Examining artificial intelligence literacy among pre-service teachers for future classrooms. Computers and Education Open, 6, Article 100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100179 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100179
Ayanwale, M. A., Sanusi, I. T., Adelana, O. P., Aruleba, K. D., & Oyelere, S. S. (2022). Teachers' readiness and intention to teach artificial intelligence in schools. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article 100099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100099
Bernardi, M. L., Capone, R., Faggiano, E., & Rocha, H. (2025). Generative AI in mathematics education: Pre-service teachers' knowledge and implications for their professional development. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 56(8), 1513–1530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2025.2490104
Blue Blocks Micro Research Institute. (2026). Micro Research Ethics Framework (MREF v1.0): An ethics standard for embedded educational research. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19047669
Carcausto Huamaní, E. J., Nieto Olivera, A. Y., & Diaz Reyes, N. F. (2026). Cultural adaptation and preliminary psychometric assessment of the IMEVID questionnaire for assessing lifestyle in adults with type 2 diabetes in Peru. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-026-01162-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-026-01162-6
Castillo-Díaz, M. A., & Periañez, C. A. H. (2026). Psychometric validation and measurement invariance of the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II in Honduran university students. BMC Public Health, 26, 229. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-25899-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-25899-9
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Magnone, K. Q., & Yezierski, E. J. (2024). Beyond convenience: A case and method for purposive sampling in chemistry teacher professional development research. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(3), 718–726. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00217
Mbona, S. V., & Msosa, S. K. (2026). Understanding artificial intelligence adoption among university students in South African higher education: A technology acceptance model approach. Frontiers in Education, 11, Article 1917699. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1917699 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1917699
Olarewaju, A. O., Moshood, A., & Awoyemi, S. A. (2025). Pre-service teachers’ awareness and utilization of AI tools in mathematics education: Evidence from Kwara State, Nigeria. Al-Hikmah Journal of Education, 12(1).
Sanusi, I. T., Ayanwale, M. A., & Tolorunleke, A. E. (2024). Investigating pre-service teachers' artificial intelligence perception from the perspective of planned behavior theory. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100202
Zakariya, Y. F. (2022). Cronbach's alpha in mathematics education research: Its appropriateness, overuse, and alternatives in estimating scale reliability. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1074430. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1074430 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1074430
Zhang, C., Schießl, J., Plößl, L., Hofmann, F., & Gläser-Zikuda, M. (2023). Acceptance of artificial intelligence among pre-service teachers: A multigroup analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00420-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00420-7
