Effect of Problem-Based Strategy on Performance in Algebra among Lower Basic Education Pupils in Zamfara State, Nigeria.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64348/zije.202529Keywords:
Problem-based learning, Performance, Algebra, Lower basic education.Abstract
This study investigated the effect of a problem-based learning (PBL) strategy on the performance of algebra among lower basic education pupils in Zamfara State, Nigeria. The research addressed the persistent issue of poor mathematics performance rates among pupils, which has been attributed to traditional lecture-based teaching methods that fail to engage students actively in deep conceptual understanding. The study adopted a quasi-experimental design, specifically the Pretest-Posttest Non-equivalent Control Group Design, to compare the outcomes of pupils taught using PBL with those exposed to conventional lecture methods. The sample consists of primary 1-3 pupils, selected through purposive and multi-stage sampling techniques. Data collection involves administering pre- and post-tests, as well as a reshuffled algebra Performance Test (APT). Descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) were used to analyze the data at a 0.05 significance level. The study aims to determine the mean performance of pupils taught with PBL, as well as any gender-based differences in performance. The findings were expected to provide insights into the effectiveness of PBL in enhancing mathematical proficiency, offering a viable alternative to traditional teaching methods in lower basic education. The research instruments were validated by the experts in Science Education and Mathematics, and reliability is established using Pearson products moment correlation coefficient (PPMC). Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 23.0. The study contributed to the growing body of evidence supporting constructivist approaches in mathematics education, emphasizing active learning, critical thinking, and real-world application.
References
Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. ASCD.
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354-380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
Conradty, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2016). Hypertext or textbook: Effects on motivation and gain in knowledge. Education Sciences, 6(3), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci6030029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci6030029
Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. Teachers College Press.
Franklin, W. A. (2015). Inquiry-based approaches to science education: Theory and practice. Retrieved from http://www.brynmawr.edu/Biology/franklin/InquiryBasedScience.html
Gaumer Erickson, A. S., & Noonan, P. M. (2018). Self-efficacy formative questionnaire. In The skills that matter: Teaching interpersonal and intrapersonal competencies in any classroom (pp. 175-176). Corwin.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
Hughes, P. W. (2014). Teaching scientific inquiry: Inquiry-based training for graduate teaching assistants improves undergraduate learning outcomes. Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario. Retrieved from http://www.heqco.ca/SiteCollectionDocuments/Carleton%20Scientific%20Inquiry%20ENG.pdf
Irinoye, I., Bamidele, E. F., Adetunji, A. A., & Awodele, B. A. (2015). Relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and demonstration method on students in secondary schools in Osun State. Advances in Social Science Research Journal, 2(2), 21-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.50.824
Kareem, A.O. (2019). Process skills application, higher order thinking skills, scientific attitude, and creativity among biology students in colleges of education in Southwestern Nigeria. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Maranan, V. M. (2017). Basic process skills and attitude toward science: Inputs to an enhanced students’ cognitive performance. Unpublished master’s thesis, Laguna State Polytechnic University, San Pablo City Campus, Philippines.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Rahayu, S. (2016). Developing science literacy of Indonesian children through learning-oriented nature of science (NOS). Professor Inauguration Speech, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia.
Rohrer, D. (2009). "The effects of spacing and mixing practice problems. “Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(1), 4-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.40.1.0004
Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H. (2010). Educational Researcher, 39(5), 406-412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X10374770
Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem-based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31-38.
Schmid, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2015). Effects of students’ effort scores in a structured inquiry unit on long-term recall abilities of content knowledge. Education Research International, 2015(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/826734 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/826734
Uzezi, J. G., & Zainab, S. (2017). Effectiveness of guided inquiry laboratory experiment on senior secondary schools’ students’ academic achievement in volumetric analysis. American Journal of Education Research, 5(7), 717-724.
Zion, M., & Mendelovici, R. (2015). Moving from structured to open inquiry: Challenges and limits. Science Education International, 23(4), 383-399.
