Qualitative Study on Correlation between Cognitive Preference style and Achievement in Sciences at Secondary School level of Education in Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64348/zije.2026268Abstract
This study explores the relationship between cognitive preferences and scientific achievement through both theoretical frameworks and empirical investigation. Drawing on models of cognitive styles such as analytic versus holistic processing, field dependence-independence, and divergent-convergent thinking the research examines how individual differences in preferred modes of information processing influence the pursuit and attainment of scientific knowledge. The theoretical analysis situates cognitive preferences within broader psychological and educational paradigms, highlighting their potential role in shaping creativity, problem-solving strategies, and disciplinary specialization. Empirical findings, based on surveys and performance measures of scientists and students across diverse fields, reveal significant correlations between specific cognitive styles and indicators of scientific productivity, including publication output, innovation, and recognition. The study concludes that cognitive preferences are not deterministic but act as enabling or constraining factors that interact with environmental, motivational, and social variables. Implications are discussed for science education, talent development, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration. In light of these findings, it is recommended that educational systems cultivate awareness of diverse cognitive styles, or cognitive preferences, and integrate flexible pedagogical approaches that nurture both analytic and holistic thinking, encourage environments that balance individual strengths with collaborative opportunities, and design talent development programs that recognize cognitive diversity as a resource for innovation. Furthermore, fostering interdisciplinary platforms that bridge different cognitive orientations can enhance creativity and resilience in scientific practice, ensuring that cognitive preferences are leveraged as assets rather than limitations in the pursuit of knowledge.
References
Abah, C. O. & Jegede, O. J. (1990). A Comparison of Cognitive Preference of Science students at 3 levels of Education in Zaria. Journal of Studies in Education 1 (1), 33-140.
Akanbi, T. (1988). Cognitive Preferences, Instructional Modes, Cognitive Development Levels and Achievement in Chemistry, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis University of Ilorin, Ilorin.
Ahmadzaide, L. & Shojoe, M. (2013) Investigating the Relationship between Cognitive Style (Field dependence/Independence and Academic Achievement in Male and Female Students of Behbahn Islamic Azad University. Journal of life Science. Biomed, 3 (3), 245
Alwi, A. (2011). Interactive Effects between Cognitive Preferences and Instructional Strategies in Museum learning Experiences. School of Multimedia Communication and Technology, University of Utara Malaysia, Sinktok Malaysia.
Alhajiya, N, & Al-Khresheh, T. (2012). The effect of Conative, Learning Style-Based Reading Programme on the Achievement of Jordanian Freshmen English Major, International Education Studies, 5, (3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n3p235
Adikwu, M.V. (2008). “Curriculum Development in Science Technology and Maths (STM),Education” A key Note Address presented at the 49th Annual Conference of Teachers Association of Nigeria, Yenegoa, Nigeria.
Akudolu, L.R. (2012). “Emerging Trends in Curriculum Development in Nigeria”. Education in Nigeria: From the Beginning to the Future, Chapter 9. 1-25.
Nuzhat, A., Sleem, R.O., Alhamdan, N. & Ashor, N. (2013). Gender differences in cognitive styles and Academic performance of medical students in Saudi Arabia, Medical Teacher, 35, 78-82 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.765545
Asuzu, C.U., (1984). Problem Solving in Science and Cognitive Categorisation Styles. Unpublished M.Ed. Dissertation, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
Bajah, S. T. (1981). Dichotomy of Science and Superstitions Beliefs. Recognition in Science Education for Africa. Journal of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria.21(1) pp.22-37.
Busari, O. O. (1991). Sustaining Students Interest in Science Cognitive Style and Teacher Variables. Journal of Science Teacher Association of Nigeria, 27, (1), pp.7-14.
Bassy, S.W, Umoren, G & Udida, L.A, (nd). “Cognitive Styles Secondary School Students Attitude and Academic Performance in Chemistry in Akwa Ibom State”, Nigeria. Cross Rivers University of Technology, Nigeria, p 12 &23.
Bachi, J.P. (nd). An Investigation into Factors Affecting Cognitive preference styles in Biology Department of Teacher Education Regional Institute of Education Ajmer, India. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in S.E. Asia, xxv (1). 41-55.
Bachi, J.P, & Uddin, H., (1990). Cognitive Preferences of Secondary School Teachers in India. The example of Uttar Pradesh, International Review of Education, 36 (4). 453-467, Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01874753
Bieri, J., (1955). Cognitive Complexity-Simplicity and Predictive behaviour, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 263-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043308
Burrows, T.A., (2008). “A Comparison Study of Cognitive Differences of Attention Detiat/Hyperactivity Disorder subtype to a Clinic Control on the Standard Binet Fifth Edition”. PhD. Thesis, University of Alberta Published Heritage Branch.
Bock, M.A. (2001). “Dimension of Cognitive Style: Integrating Definition and improving Measurement”. PhD. Thesis, University of Connecticut, p. 13, 14 & 24.
B/Tudu, S.Y. (1998). Participation of Muslim women of N/Nigeria in public life with particular reference to Sokoto, Kebbi and Zamfara state from 1960 to date. Thesis, Department of Islamic studies, Usman Danfodio University, Sokoto, Nigeria.
Caesar, A, & Reuven, L.B., (2010). “Cognitive Preferences and Critical Thinking Skill of 11th Grade Biology Students”. Paper presented at EAPRIL International Conference on Challenges in Professional Learning Across the Disciplines Libon, Portugal, 24-26.
Chiou, W. (2008). College Students’ Role Models, Learning Styles Preferences and Academic Achievement in Collaborative Teaching, Absolute versus Relativistic Thinking. Adolescence. 143 (169). 137 & 139. Liberal Publishers.
Driver, R. et al (1994). Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom Educational Researcher. 23(7) pp.5-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023007005
Dube, G. E. (1971). Cognitive Preferences and Interest of Chemistry Students in Secondary Schools. Master’s Thesis, University of East Anglia.
Dalhatu, S. (2013). Girl Child Education: The Challenges and a Road Map to the Attainment of a Qualitative Education in Nigeria. Kabai Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies.1(1). 25-32.
Dragon, K. (2009). “Field Dependence and Field Independent Student Achievement in Technology based Learning: A Meta-Analysis”. A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Education, Heritage Branch, P 2-6.
Davis, L.W,. (2012). “A Comparison of Learning Styles and Academic Performance of Students Enrolled in Introductory Poultry Science in Bachelors of Science and Association of Applied Science Programme”. A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University. In partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the degree of Masters of Science. P 25-33.
Damavandi, A.J, Muhyuddin, R, Habibah, E.O, Muhammad, D, S, & Shabani, J. (2011). Academic Achievement of Students with Different Learning Styles, International Journal of Psychological Studies, 3, (2), 186.
Dunn, R, Dunn, K, & Price, G.E., (1989). Learning Styles Inventory, Lawrence, KS: Price Systems.
Easke, B., & Black, K.N. (1971). Conceptual Tempo in Young grade School Children. Child Development, 42, 505-516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1127483
Eboy, D.W. & Mulner, L.J. (2014), Marching Traffic Safety Strategies to Youth Characteristics: A Literature Review of Cognitive Development Transportation Research Institute. 78 & 79. Retrieved from www.nhtsa.govv/people/injury/research/jouthcharacteristics.November, 2014.
Ehindero, O. (1986). The School and Curriculum Evaluation in Nigeria, Ibadan, Text Flow Ltd. Federal Republic of Nigeria, (2004) National Policy on Education, Revised Edition. Lagos, NERDC.
Fafunwa, B. (1974). History of Education in Nigeria, London: Geoge Allen and Union.
Felder, R, M., & Sporlin, J.E. (2005). Application, Reliability and Validity of the index of Learning Styles. Intl. J. Engr. Education, 2, (1), 103-112.
Gowers, A. (2007).” Gender differences in Children and Adults in Cognitive Styles, Academic Visual Motor, Emotional and Behavioural Functioning in Clinic Referred Population”. A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Education in Counselling Psychology, P 26.
Gould, T.E. & Caswell, S.V. (2006). Stylistic Learning Differences Between Underground Athletic Training Students and Education, Gregore Mind Styles, Journal of Athletic Training, 41 (1), 109-106.
Gusau, A.M., Etal (2013). Public Perception on Muslim Female Education in Zamfara State, Nigeria. Kabai Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies. (1) 189-203.
Gardner, R. (1965). Cognitive Styles in Categorising Behaviour, Journal of Personality. 22 (2) 214-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1953.tb01807.x
Gibbs, B.G., (2009). “Gender and Cognitive Skills throughout childhood” PhD Dissertation Ohio State University. 9 & 100.
Heath, R. W. (1964). Curriculum Cognition and Educational Measurement. Educational and psychological Measurement. Vol.21, 235-253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446402400206
Hau, G.B., Siraj, S., Alias, N., Abdu Rauf, R.A., Zakari, A.R., & Darusalam, G. (2013). Research and trends in the Field of Technology-Enhanced Learning from 2006-2011. Content Analysis of Quick Response Code (QR code) and its Application in Selected Studies, The Malaysian online Journal of Educational Technology (MOJET), 1 (1) 54-72.
Hume, A, & Coll, R.K. (2009) Consideration for Cognitive preferences to Enhance Effective HCL in online Exhibits. International Journal of Computer Information System and Industrial Management Applications 3, MIR Labs, Dynamic Publishers, inc.USA, http//www.mirlabs.net?ijcisim/index.html. November, 2014.
Hyde, J.S. (2005). The Gender Similarities Hypothesis. American Psychologist, 581- 592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581
Hunt, R., Krzystofiak, F., Meindl, J., & Yoosry, A. (1989). Cognitive Style and Decision Making. Organisational behaviour and Human Decision Process. 144, 436-453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(89)90018-6
Joe, A. J. (1983). An Exploratory Study of Nigerian Students Cognitive Preferences in Biology. Journal of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria. Vol. 22(1)104-112.
Jungwirth, E. (1980). Alternative Interpretation of Findings in Cognitive Preference Research in Science Education. Science Education, Vol. 58(2) pp.85-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730640110
Jung, C.G. (1923). Psychological types. New York: Harc out, Brace and Co. Ltd.
Igwebuike, T. B. (1991). Managing Cognitive Dissonance during Science Instruction. Journal of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, Vol. 27(1), 89-94.
Inbar, D.E. (1995). The Cognitive Preferences of School Principal. Journal of Educational Administration, 33, (2), 5-19, MCB UP Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09578239510081273
Ibrahim, K.M., Abubakar, Z., Surif, J, & Siewli, W., (20080. Relationship Between Cognitive Styles, Levels of Cognitive Thinking and Chemistry achievement among Form Four Science Student.
Kalgo F. A. (1993). “Cognitive Style, Personality and Academic Achievement among Junior Secondary School Students of Sokoto State”. Ph.D. Thesis, UDUS.
Kempa, R.F. & Dube, G.E. (1973). Cognitive Preference Orientation in Students of Chemistry. British Journal of psychology. Vol. 43(3) pp. 279-288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1973.tb02268.x
Kozhevinikov, M. (2007). Cognitive Styles in the Context of Modern Psychology Toward an Interrelated Frame Work of Cognitive Styles, Psychological Bulletins by the American Psychological Association. Vol. 133, No. 3 464-481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.3.464
Kargan, J. (1965). Impulsive and Reflective Children: Significance of Conceptual Tempo, Inj. Krum boltz (Ed), Car Michael’s Manual of Child Psychology, 1273- 1365, New York: John Wiley and Son, Inc.
Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and Innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology. 61. 622-629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.61.5.622
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experimental Learning. Engle Wood Cliffs. NT: Prentice Hall.
Klein, G.S. (1951). A personal World through Perception. Inc. Blake and G.V. Ramsey (Ed), Perception, An approach to Personality DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/11505-012
Lijnse, P.L, (2007). Curriculum Development in Physics Education. State Education. Retrieved from http://www./phyisca.ohiotossem/ICPE/E1 html.
Lehman, M.E., (2011). Relationship of Learning Styles. Grades and Instructional Preferences. NACT Journal, (3), 40-45.
Lilia Halima, N.B. (2007). Development of Entrepreneurial science thinking Model from Science and Technology. Seminar Pendedidikan Kejuruteran da Alam Bina.34-42
Marks, L. H. (1967). CBA High School Chemistry and concept formation. Journal of Chemical education. Vol.44 pp.471-474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ed044p471
Messick, S. (1976). “Individuality in Learning San Francisco”. Jersey and Buss Publishers.
Mckay, E, & Alwi, A. (2011). Consideration for Cognitive Preferences to Enhance Effective HCL in online Exhibits. International Journal of Computer Information System and Industrial Management Application. 3 MIR Labs. Dynamic Publisher, Inc. USA. http://www.mirlabs.netS/ijcisim/index.html. 08 November, (2014).
Muhammad, T. & Shinkafi, S.A, (2013). A Review of the Effort of STAN towards Teacher Education in Nigeria. Kabai Journal of Multidisplinary Studies. 1 (1). PP 140-146,
Messeng, L.Y. (1980). Cognitive Preferences of Malaysia Pre-University Students in Chemistry. A Thesis submitted in Partial Fulfilment for the award of Master of Education University Malaysia. 6 & 7.
Muhyuddin, R, Elias, H, Mohammad D.S, & Shahabain, J. (2011). Academic Achievement of Students with Different Learning Styles. International of Psychological Studies. 3 (2). http://www.ccsenet.org/ijps. November, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v3n2p186
Muhammad, T.(2008). “Integrated Science Cognitive Preferences of Junior Secondary Schools Students in Zamfara State”. (Implications for Curriculum Development), M.Ed. Thesis, UDUS, Nigeria.
Muhammad, T. (2011). Vision and Mission of Science and Technology Education in Nigeria: The way forward. Sardauna Journal of Education (SAJE). A Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Studies. A publication of Colleges of Education Academic Staff Union, (COEASU). 2 (1), PP, 135-140.
Muhammad, T, & Hano, J.L. (2012). Comparison of Students’ Cognitive Preferences in some selected Science and Non-science Secondary Schools in Zamfara State, Bakalori Journal of General Studies, 4, 2, 872-876
Myers, B.E, & Dyer, J.E., (2006). The influences of Student Learning Style on Thinking Skill, Journal of Agricultural Education, 47 1, 43-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2006.01043
McCabe, C. (2014). Preferred Learning Styles among College Students: Does Sex Matters. North American Journal of Psychology, 16 1, P 89-977.
Muhammad, M and Mckay, E. (2011). The Effects of Cognitive Preferences and Prior Knowledge on web Mediated Instruction, Proceedings of the International Engineering and Technology Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, PP 16-19.
Moore, S. (2002). Cognitive Styles Among Computer Systems Students: Primary Findings, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, spring. 1, 42- 46.
Naught, M.C. (1982). Relationship between Cognitive Preferences and Achievement in Chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19 (2) pp.177-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660190209
NnaSunday, O. (2011). “The New Senior Secondary School Curricula. Prospect and Challenges for Achieving the Millennium Development Goals”. A Paper Presented at the 8th Annual Conference on Educational Crisis and Millennium Development Goals in Nigeria.
Novak, C.M. (2009).” Cognitive Preference and Ethnic Identity among Angola and Native American High School Students” A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirement for Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Department of Psychology, Walden University, P 6, 7 & 117.
Offorma, G.C. (2005). “Curriculum for Wealth Creation”. Paper presented at the Seminar of the World Council for Curriculum and Instruction, Held at Federal College of Education, Kano, Nigeria.
Ogunsola, F. (1980) “A study of Cognitive Style among S.B.S A.B.U. Chemistry Students” A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirement for Degree of In Science Education. ABU Zaria.
Ogunsola, M. F. & Shuaibu, M.J. (1983). Cognitive Styles in Students of Chemistry SBS/ABU Zaria, Nigeria, Research in Science and Technology Education, 1(1) 101-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514830010111
Oluniy, O. & Olajamuke, A.C. (2013). Curriculum Development in Nigeria; Historical Perspective. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3, (1) 2239-978.
Omoifo, C.N. (1986). “The pattern of Cognitive Style among Chemistry CESAC Biology Studies of SBS/ABU, Zaria” M.Ed. Thesis, ABU Zaria Nigeria.
Okenini, J.E. (2009). “Girls Child Education and Its Challenges the Universal Basic Education” Post Graduate Diploma in Education (PGDE). National Teachers Institute Kaduna, Gusau Branch, Zamfara State, Nigeria.
Okebukola, P. A. (1986). Cognitive Preference and Learning Mode as determinants of Meaningful learning through concept mapping. Science Education, 72 (4) 489 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730720408
Orr, B., Park. O., Thomson, D. & Thomson, C.J., (1999). Learning Styles of Post- Secondary Students Enrolled in Vocational Technical Institute. Journal of Industrial Teachers Education, 36 (4), 17.
Orji, N.S., (2010). “The New Senior Secondary School Curriculum Trade Entrepreneurship” Paper Presented at the Sensitization and advocacy Workshop for Adamawa State Teachers in the Years Basic Education and Senior Education Curriculum, Held at the N.U.T Hall Jalingo, Nigeria.
Piaget, J. (1972). Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development, 15, 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000271225
Parllet, M. (1970). The Syllabus-bound Students. In. Hudson (Ed.). The Ecology of Human Intelligence, Harmon ds Worth, Middle sex, England; Penguin Books.
Palaniappan, A.K. (1998). Figural Creativity and Cognitive Preference among Malaysian Undergraduate Students. Journal of Psychology Interdisciplinary and Applied, 132 (4), 381-388. http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/vjr/20. Published Online, (2010). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989809599272
Pithers, R.T. (2002). Cognitive Learning Style: A Review of the Dependent-Field Independent approach. Journal of Vocational Education and Training. 54 (1), 120-125. Retrieved from http://www.tadfonline.com/loi/rjue. November (2014) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820200200191
Reissman F. (1966). Styles of learning National Education Association Journal, March 15-17.
Rest, J,. Cooper, R., Masanz, J., & Anderson, D. (1974). Judgement Issues in Moral Development an Objective Measure of Development. Developmental Psychology, 10, 491-501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036598
Ryding, R. & Rayner S. (1998). “Cognitive styles and learning strategies”. David Fulton publication.
Rogel, M. (1974). Achievement and Cognitive Preference Studies of Chemistry Students, who studied different Curricula in Israel. Master’s Thesis University of Jerusalem.
Riding, R. & Cheema, T. (1991). Cognitive Style an Overview and Integration. Educational Psychology, 11 (1), 193-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341910110301
Sawyer, E. S. (1980). Cultural Conflicts in the Second School Students. The Sokoto Experience, Nigeria Journal of Curriculum Studies 2 (1), 22-27.
Smith, D.R. (2008). “Learning Style Preference, Sense of Classroom Community, Gender, Age and Previous experience within Computer-Mediated Instruction (CMI)” PhD. Dissertation University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
Sternberg, R.J., Grigorenkoo, E.L & Zang, L. (2014). Styles of Learning and Thinking Matter in Institution and Assessment. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 3 (6) 486-504. Retrieved from http://ippps.sagepub.com/content/3/B/586.November, (2014).
Stephen, U. (2002). “Cognitive Styles and Students’ Problem solving Competence in Physic “PhD. Thesis University of Uyo, Nigeria.
Smolak, L. (1986). Infancy. Prentice-Hall, Eagle wood Cliffs, N.J.
Sivanessharajah, A. (2009). “Developing New Guidelines for Secondary Schools Curriculum in Seirilanka” A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Education, University of Malaya in
Tamir, P. (1979). The Relationship among Cognitive Preference, School Environment, Teachers Curriculum Bias and Subject Matter, American Educational Research Journal, 12, 235-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312012003235
Tamir, P. (1974). Cognitive Preference and Achievement. British Journalof Educational Psychology, 46, (1)57-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02986.x
Tamir, P., (1975) .A Note on Cognitive Preference in Schools. Studies in Science Education. Vol.4. 111-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267708559848
Tamir, P. & Lunetta, V. (1978). Cognitive Preference in Biology of Group of Talented High School Students Journal of Research in Science Teaching 15, 10, 59- 64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660150109
Tamir, P. & Kempa R.F. (1978). Cognitive Styles across School Discipline. Science Education. Vol. 62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730620202
Tamir, P. (1957). The Relationship among Cognitive Preference, School Environment,Teachers Curriculum bias, Curriculum and Subject Matter. American Educational Research Journal. 12, (2). 35-64. Retrieved from
http://wwwcrossref/crossREF/isi/infotrievel. 13 November, (2014).
Tamir, P. (1981). Validation of Cognitive preferences. British Educational Research, 7 (1), 37-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192810070104
Wasagu, M. A. (1991). A Study of Relationship between Cognitive Preference and Attitude towards Science. Sokoto Educational Review, Vol. 2 (11) pp.11-22.
Wasagu, M. A. (1998). Cultural Beliefs, Cognitive Preference and Achievement in Science, A of Science Secondary School Students in Sokoto State, Nigeria” Ph.D. Thesis. UDUS, Sokoto, Nigeria.
Wasagu, M.A. (1990) “Attitude toward Science school as correlated of Cognitive Preferences Orientation among students in Science Secondary Schools in Sokoto State M.Ed. Thesis ABU, Zaria.
Witkin, H. A. & Good Enough, D. R. (1977). Field Dependence Revised, (ETS RB 77- 16) Princeton: Educational Testing Service. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1977.tb01141.x
Wolf, P. Hill, A. & Evers, F. (2006). Hand Book for Curriculum Assessment. ERDU. Educational Research and Development Unit 5 & 6.
Watkins, D.T. (1976). “A Study of Cognitive Preference to interpret Student Learning in the Biological Science Curriculum Study-Green Version in Higher School of Pennsylvania” A Thesis of Academic Curriculum and Instructions Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education. 10-13.
Zhidong, D.Z. (2013). “Human Gender Differences in Cognitive Preferences towards Attractive Faces in Visual Oddball Paradigm an ERP Study” Foundation and Practical Applications of Cognitive Systems and Information Processing Advances in intelligent System and Computing. Science Line Publication. 215- 248.
Zainol Abidin, M.J. Alizaee, A., Nor Abdullah, H. & Balbir Singh, K.K. (2011). Learning Styles and Overall Academic Achievement in a Specific Educational System. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. Centre for Promoting Ideas, USA.1 (10).
Zhangy, Y. Kong, F., Jackson, T. & Hassan, A.N. (2011). “Identifying cognitive Preference for Attractive Faces: An even-related Potential Experiment using a Study-test Paradigm” J. Neuroscience Resource, 89 (11). 1887-1893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.22724
Zohan, A., (2004). Higher order thinking in Science Classroom: Students Learning And Teachers’ Professional Development. Nether Land. Klur Academic Publisher. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1854-1
