Analysis of Linear Equating in WAEC, NECO, and NABTEB Senior School Certificate Multiple-Choice Economics Examinations in North West, Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64348/zije.2025176Abstract
This paper investigated the analysis of linear equating method on WAEC, NECO, and NABTEB Senior School Certificate Multiple-Choice Economics Examinations in Northwest Nigeria. The “Non-Equivalent Anchor Test (NEAT) group Design” was adopted for this study. The population comprised 404,521 public senior secondary school students of 2023/2024 academic session and a sample of 1,532 SSII Economics students was drawn through multi-stage sampling procedure from the population. The instruments used for data collection were the adapted 2023 WAEC, NECO, and NABTEB SSCE multiple-choice Economics papers with reliability coefficient of 0.75, 0.89, and 0.88 respectively obtained by the researcher using split half method. The research questions were answered using descriptive statistics of mean and standard T-scores. Major findings revealed that (1) there is significant differences in difficulty between the pair of form A-C (t-4.473=.000, p < 0.05) and B-C (t-4.375=.000, p < 0.05), (2) there was no significant difference in the respondents performance on common items across the three examinations (ႿWA = 2.121; ႿNE = 2.114; ႿNA = 2.504), (3) while performance on unique items varied across the test forms (ႿWA = 7.30 < ႿNE = 7.40 < ႿNA = 8.34), with form C exhibiting the highest mean performance and form A the least performance (4) linear equating method revealed a positive linear relationship between raw scores and T-scores. The researchers concluded that form C (NABTEB) was distinctly easier, indicating significant differences from other forms (WAEC & NECO) that shown no statistical difference in students' ability or proficiency, that both test items are comparable. It was therefore recommended among others linear equating method for equating scores across these WAEC, NECO, and NABTEB Economics multiple-choice test should be considered.
References
Adom, D., Mensah, J. A. & Dake, D. A. (2020). Test, measurement, and evaluation: Understanding and use of the concepts in education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 9 (1), pp. 109~119. Available at http://ijere.iaescore.com DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20457
Agah, J.J. (2013). Relative efficiency of test scores equating methods in the comparison of students’ continuous assessment measures: PhD thesis. Nsukka: University of Nigeria.
Albano, A. D. (2011). Equate: Statistical methods for test equating [Computer software manual]. Available from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=equate (R package).
Alfred, O. (2013). Assessment of the equivalence of 2009 senior school certificate multiple -choice Economics test items in Ilorin, Nigeria. M.Ed thesis, University of Ilorin. Ilorin.
Arokoyo (2021), Levine Linear and Chained Equipercentile Equating Of Senior School Certificate Examination Chemistry Multiple-Choice Papers in South-West, Nigeria. A Ph.D. Thesis at the University of Ilorin, Nigeria.
Bandele, S. O., & Adewale, A. E. (2013). Comparative analysis of the item difficulty levels of WAEC, NECO and NABTEB Mathematics achievement examinations. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 761-765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2013.v3n2p397
Dorans, N. J., Moses, T. P., & Eignor, D. R. (2010). Principles and practices of test score equating (ETS Research Report No. RR-10-29): New Jersey: ETS Princeton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2010.tb02236.x
Daramola, D.S.; Olutola, A. T. and Jimoh, M. I. (2022). Analysis of Linear Equating of
Senior School Certificate Multiple Choice Examination Papers in Economics. SPEKTA:
Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat: Teknologi dan Aplikasi, 3 (2), 147-158.
Daramola, D.S.; Owolabi, H.O. and Olutola, A.T. (2018). Equipercentile Equating of WAEC, NECO and NABTEB Senior School Certificate Multiple Choice Test Items in Economics. Journal of Education in Developing Areas (JEDA), 26 (2), 658-668.
Holland, P. W. & Dorans, N. J. (2006). Linking and equating. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 187-220). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2014). Test equating, scaling, and linking: Methods and practices (3rd ed.). Springer Science & Business Media. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0317-7
Obinne, A. D. E. (2011). A psychometric analysis of two major examinations in Nigeria: Standard error of measurement. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2), 137-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2011.11890018
Obinne, A.D.E., Nworgu, B.G., & Umobong, M.E. (2013). An investigation into differential item functioning of tests conducted by the two major examination bodies in Nigeria. Advances in Educational Research 2 (1), 1-8.
Olatunji, D.S. (2007). Effects of number of options on psychometric properties of multiple choice tests in Economics. Unpublished M.Ed Thesis, University of Ilorin, Ilorin.
Olatunji, D. S. (2015). Analysis of linear and equipercentile equating of senior school certificate examination economics multiple-choice papers In Kwara State, Nigeria. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ilorin.
Olutola, A.T. (2011). Analysis of item parameters of senior school certificate multiple choice in biology in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, University of Ilorin, Ilorin.
Olutola, A.T. (2015). Item Difficulty and Discrimination Indices of Multiple Choice Biology Tests. Liceo Journal of Higher Education Research, 11(1), 16-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7828/ljher.v11i1.890
Ryan, J. (2011). A Practitioner’s Introduction to Equating with Primers on Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory. Arizona State University Frank Brockmann, Center Point Assessment Solutions.
Uysal, I. & Kilmen, S. (2016). Comparison of item response theory test equating methods for mixed format tests. Int. Online Journal of Educational Sciences. 6(2) 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2016.02.001
Wiberg, M. & von Davier, A. A. (2017). Examining the impact of covariates on anchor tests to ascertain quality over time in a college admissions test. International Journal of Testing. 1-22. 105-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2016.1277357
