Qualitative Study on Forgiveness in Adversarial and Yoruba Traditional Judicial Systems; An Appraisal from Selected Yorùbá Written Plays
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64348/zije.2025155Abstract
Many factors differentiate the adversarial judicial system from its Yoruba traditional counterpart. This study gives readers a clear understanding of forgiveness and punishment as major components for engendering justice, social peace and reconciliation in Yoruba traditional justice administration. While on the other hand, argues that the adversarial justice has no room for forgiveness and reconciliation but awards penalties as means of retribution, deterrence, which often does not heal the wound occasioned by conflict. The thrust of the essay is that the general mindset of justice in Yoruba tradition engenders peaceful and harmonious settlement of conflicts unlike adversarial justice which leaves no room for reconciliation. The essay adopts Restorative Justice Theory in conjunction with data from Yoruba drama texts; Atari Ajanaku, Ogun Lakaaye and Ebi taa ni? The paper therefore concludes that, it is not in all situations that punishment related judgment serves the purpose of healing the wound, but the combination of the spirit of punishment and mercy foster unity. Therefore, suggests incorporating mercy and forgiveness in its dispute resolution mechanism.
References
Adebayo, A. & Adefarasin, V. (nd) ‘Communal Solidarity and the Challenge of Intergenerational Punitive System in Africa; The Yoruba Experience’’. Drumspeak. 6 (1) Downloaded 28 March, 2025, from http;//doi.org10.47963/drumspeak.
Adigun, A (2020). Ẹ̀bi Taa ni? Ibadan Lolyem Communication
Aina, A. I. (2015). The Challenges of Accessing Justice in Comtemporary African Society: Lessons from Yoruba juristic practices. An online edition of Al-Hikaat, 35, 65-82. Downloaded 11 January, 2024, from https:www.researchgate.net.
Ajiṣafẹ, E. A. (1906). The Law and Customs of the Yoruba People. Abeokuta: Ola Fola Bookshhops, 33-64
Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and Responsive Regulation. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195136395.001.0001
Federal Republic of Nigeria Official Gazette (2011). Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria as Amended, Abuja: Government Press.
Immanuel, K. (1994). Philosophy of Law. Carlifonia: W. Hastie Tran Publication
Lálẹ́yẹ, S. (2014). Punishment and Forgiveness in the Administration of Justice in Traditional African Thought: The Yoruba Example. International Journal of Philosophy and Theology, 2,( 4) 165-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15640/ijpt.v2n4a10
Mbiti, J, (1969). African Religions and the Philosophy, Oxford, Heinemann
Ògúnníran, L. (2001). Àtàrí Àjànàkú. Nigeria: Evans Brothers
Ọlátúbọ̀sun, O. (1983). Ògún Lákáayé. Ibadan: Onibon-oje Press
Oluwole, I. (1984). ‘Conflict between Customary and Non-Customary Systems of Law: Preliminary Observations’. Retrieved 13 May, 2024, from http://www.nomos.elibrary. de/anb ni.
Onadeko, T. (2008). Yoruba Traditional Adjudicatory Systems. In African Study monographs, 29 (1), 15-28.
Raphael, D.D (1970). the problem of Political Philosophy, London; Macmillaǹ
Stephanos, B. (2007). Forgiveness in Criminal Procedure. Retrieved 20 March, 2024, from htts:// scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty _scholarship/ 920. 330-348.



