Perceived Influence of Conversational AIs on Research Learning and Knowledge Acquisition among Science Education Undergraduates, Benue State University, Makurdi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64348/zije.2026638Keywords:
: Conversational AIs, Science Education Research, Research Learning, Research Knowledge Acquisition, GenderAbstract
This study investigated the perceived influence of conversational AIs on research learning and research knowledge acquisition among 400-level Science Education undergraduates at Benue State University, Makurdi using a descriptive comparative survey design. The study was anchored on Social Constructivism, Connectivism, the Technology Acceptance Model and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. From a population of 124 400-level undergraduates in the Department of Science and Mathematics Education (2024/2025), a sample size of 95 (50 males and 45 females) was determined using Taro Yamane formula and drawn by a multi-stage sampling. Data were collected using Conversational AIs and Science Education Research Questionnaire (CAISERQ) and Research Knowledge Acquisition Test (RKAT). The instruments were validated by three experts and trial-tested with reliability values of 0.75 (Cronbach's alpha) and 0.78 (KR-20), respectively. Mean and standard deviation were used to answer research questions with a criterion mean of 2.50, while the independent samples t-test was used to test the hypotheses at 0.05 level of significance. Findings showed high perceived influence of conversational AIs on research learning for both genders, with all 15 items above the criterion mean and cluster means of 3.28 for males and 3.31 for females. The gender difference was not significant [t (93) = 0.756, p = .451]. Likewise, male (M = 23.06) and female (M = 23.02) undergraduates had similar research knowledge acquisition scores, with no significant difference [t (93) = 0.068, p = 0.946]. It was concluded that male and female undergraduates perceive and benefit from conversational AI in a similar way. The study recommended integration of AI literacy into research methodology courses and implementation of conversational AIs as supplementary supervision support.
References
Adebayo, O. S., & Lawal, A. T. (2022). Gender-based perceptions of artificial intelligence chatbots as learning support tools for undergraduate research in science education in Ibadan, Oyo State. Journal of Science Education and Technology Studies, 10(2), 45–58.
Al Thani, N. J., & Ahmad, A. (2025). Research-based learning in higher education: Enhancing students' inquiry and critical thinking skills. International Journal of Educational Research, 120, 102210.
Almusharraf, N., & Bailey, D. (2021). Online engagement and learning outcomes: The role of AI-based educational tools. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 3491–3513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10425-2
American Library Association. (2024). Media literacy education for adult audiences: Exploring ChatGPT and conversational AI. https://www.programminglibrarian.org/learn/media-literacy-education-adult-audiences-exploring-chatgpt-and-conversational-ai
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Ayua, G. A., & Kwagh, T. C. (2026). Fostering honesty and integrity in the age of gen-AI: Rethinking ethical scientific attitudes in science education research. Journal of Studies in Science Education, 6(1), 362-369. https://jossme.org.ng/articles?page=4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.67203/jossme.2026.f7ovll68
Ayua, G. A., Agbidye, A., Terhemba, W. K., Halilu, E. Z., Ude, M. M., & Ikyernum, G. S. (2026a). Gender as a correlate of students' interest in science and Mathematics education in Makurdi. British Journal of Contemporary Research, 1(3), Article 056. https://bexfordpublishing.co.uk/journals/bjcr/articles/BEX_JUL_26_287 DOI: https://doi.org/10.67693/BJCR-Z2U8ZKCN
Ayua, G. A., Ijauka, P., Okanche, S., Obonga, I. J., Obu, R. O., & Iorpenda, N. P. (2026b). Gender differences in AI chatbots utilization and research knowledge acquisition among final-year science education undergraduates. Benue State University Journal of Science, Mathematics and Computer Education, 6(1), 40-52. https://bsum.edu.ng/journals/jsmce/v6n1/download.php?id=375
Ayua, G. A., Kwagh, T. C., Okanche, S., Obonga, I. J., Obu, R. O., & Tavershima, U. A. (2026c). Perceived influence of artificial intelligence chatbots on self-efficacy and attitude in science education research among undergraduate students in Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria. Zamfara International Journal of Education, 6(4), 260-266. https://doi.org/10.64348/zije.2026485 DOI: https://doi.org/10.64348/zije.2026485
Ayua, G. A., Samuel, K., & Agbidye, A. (2022a). Science education supervisors' expectation on research project writing and attitude to its supervision in Nigerian universities. Journal of Science, Technology, Mathematics and Entrepreneurial Education, 2(1), 177-187. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365701393
Ayua, G. A., Samuel, K., & Agbidye, A. (2022b). Science education students' expectation on research project supervision and attitude to its writing in Nigerian universities. African Journal of Science, Technology and Mathematics Education, 8(7), 615-621. https://www.ajstme.com.ng
Ayua, G. A., Taangahar, B. A., Igyu, C. O., Akogwu, P., Ochigbo, P. O., & Avule, I. (2026d). Subject-based influence of artificial intelligence chatbots on undergraduates' research project writing and knowledge acquisition in Benue State University, Makurdi. Zamfara International Journal of Education, 6(5), 277-285. https://doi.org/10.64348/zije.2026546 DOI: https://doi.org/10.64348/zije.2026546
Ayua, G. A., Taangahar, B. A., Ikyernum, G. S., Iorkase, R. N., & Kwaghtongu, R. T. (2026e). Exploring gender as a correlate of undergraduates' interest in science and technology education. British Journal of Contemporary Research, 1(1), Article 006. https://bexfordpublishing.co.uk/journals/bjcr/articles/BEX_MAY_26_009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.67693/BJCR-AQIID35M
Brew, A. (2013). Understanding the scope of undergraduate research: A framework for curricular and pedagogical decision-making. Higher Education, 66(5), 603–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9624-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9624-x
Cherukunnath, D., & Singh, A. P. (2022). Exploring cognitive processes of knowledge acquisition to upgrade academic practices. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 682628. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.682628/full DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.682628
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Duit, R. (2007). Science education research – An indispensable requirement for improving science education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(1), 3-15. https://www.ejmste.com/article/science-education-research-an-indispensable-requirement-for-improving-science-education-4080 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75369
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., ... Wright, R. (2023). So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Essel, H. B., Vlachopoulos, D., Essuman, A. B., & Amankwa, J. O. (2024). The effect of ChatGPT on the research skills and knowledge acquisition of university students. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2024.7.1.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2024.7.1.6
Evans, C., Howson, C. K., Forsythe, A., & Edwards, C. (2021). What constitutes high-quality higher education? Higher Education Pedagogies, 6(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2021.1944028
Eze, P. N., & Mohammed, A. (2023). Influence of artificial intelligence Chatbots on knowledge retention in undergraduate science education research projects in Zaria, Kaduna State. Nigerian Journal of Educational Research, 18(1), 88–102.
Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/developing-undergraduate-research-and-inquiry
Hwang, G. J., & Chien, S. Y. (2022). Definition, roles, and potential research issues of the metaverse in education: An artificial intelligence perspective. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100082
Igyu, C. O., Ayua, G. A., & Agbidye, A. (2023, October). Effect of blended learning on ICT performance among Nigerian undergraduate teacher trainees. School of Science and Technology Education, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Nigeria 9th International Conference Proceedings, 436-443.
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S., & Khan, I. H. (2023). Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT tool towards ameliorating the education system. Bench Council Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(2), 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100115
Jomen, E. O., & Ayua, G. A. (2026). Effect of AI-personalised learning strategy on critical thinking of Integrated Science undergraduates in Makurdi: The role of gender. Benue State University Journal of Science, Mathematics and Computer Education, 6(1), 114-124.
Jomen, E. O., Ayua, G. A., Terhemba, W. K., & Fakaa, S. G. (2026). Effect of artificial intelligence-personalised learning strategy on creative thinking skills of Integrated Science undergraduate students in Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria. Zamfara International Journal of Education, 6(5), 286-294. https://doi.org/10.64348/zije.2026547 DOI: https://doi.org/10.64348/zije.2026547
Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2(3), 151–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288391
Levy, P., & Petrulis, R. (2012). How do first-year university students experience inquiry and research, and what are the implications for the practice of inquiry-based learning? Studies in Higher Education, 37(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.499166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.499166
Okeke, C. I. O., & Anyaogu, R. (2020). Challenges in science education and research development in Nigeria. Journal of Science Education and Practice, 5(1), 45–58.
Okonkwo, C. W., & Ade-Ibijola, A. (2021). Chatbots applications in education: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100033
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.
Suleiman, A., & Danjuma, I. (2024). Students' perceptions of AI chatbot-supported learning and retention of research skills among science education undergraduates. Ilorin Journal of Education, 14(2), 101–115.
Terhemba, W. K., & Ayua, G. A. (2026). Qualitative study on digital classrooms, equal futures: Artificial intelligence-powered digital pedagogy for closing the gender digital divide in STEM. Zamfara International Journal of Education, 6(5), 321-332. https://doi.org/10.64348/zije.2026552
Vanichvasin, P. (2022). The impact of chatbots on student learning and satisfaction in entrepreneurship education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(6), 123–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v15n6p15
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper and Row.
Yin, J., Goh, T.-T., Yang, B., & Xiaobin, Y. (2021). Conversation technology with micro-learning: The impact of chatbot-based learning on students' learning motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(1), 154-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120952067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120952067
Zimbardo, P. (2023). Acquisition: Psychology definition, history & examples. https://www.zimbardo.com/acquisition-psychology-definition-history-examples/
